MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170749669 · doi:10.1109/pes.2011.6038901

A pattern recognition approach for detecting power islands using transient signals — Part I: Design and implementation

2011· article· en· W2170749669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingTransient (computer programming)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceWavelet transformArtificial intelligenceDecision treeVoltageTransient voltage suppressorWaveformFeature vectorCategorizationClassifier (UML)WaveletElectronic engineeringElectric power systemPower (physics)EngineeringRadarTelecommunicationsPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel, pattern-recognition-based approach for fast detection of power islands in a distribution network is investigated. The proposed method utilizes transient signals generated during an islanding event to detect the formation of the island. A decision-tree classifier is trained to categorize the transient generating events as “islanding” or “non-islanding.” The feature vectors required for classification were extracted from the transient current and voltage signals through discrete wavelet transform. The proposed technique is tested on a medium-voltage distribution system with multiple distributed generators. The results indicate that this technique can accurately detect islanding events very fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207