SLA: A Stage-Level Latency Analysisfor Real-Time Communicationin a Pipelined Resource Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a communication analysis for hard real-time systems interconnects. The objective is to provide tight estimates on the worst-case communication latency between communicating processing elements that use a priority-aware communication medium for data transmission. The communication model consists of communication tasks transmitting data across a series of pipelined resources. The analysis incorporates interferences caused by multiple communication tasks requesting the pipelined resources, and it captures parallel transmission of data between multiple pipeline stages. We call this analysis a stage-level analysis. We evaluate the proposed analysis through simulation of synthetic benchmarks, and we apply the analysis to an instantiation of a platform proposed by Shi and Burns. Our experiments confirm that stage-level analysis provides tight upper-bounds when compared to previous work and improves schedulability by 34 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it