Voltage‐gated Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels and intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> release regulate exocytosis in identified rat corticotrophs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The patch clamp technique was used in conjunction with a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator (indo-1, or indo-1FF) to measure simultaneously cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and exocytosis (changes in membrane capacitance) in single, identified rat corticotrophs. 2. Exocytosis could be stimulated by extracellular Ca2+ entry (via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels). A train of depolarizations could exhaust the pool of readily releasable granules and the pool replenished with a time constant of 42 s (at 22-25 C). 3. Recordings from cells with 0.5 mM intracellular cAMP showed that the amplitude of the depolarization-triggered exocytosis, the Ca2+ sensitivity of exocytosis, as well as the rate of replenishment of the readily releasable pool, were similar to the controls. 4. Exocytosis could also be stimulated by intracellular Ca2+ release from the inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate (IP3)-sensitive store (via flash photolysis of caged IP3). At comparable [Ca2+]i, extracellular Ca2+ entry and intracellular Ca2+ release had similar efficacy in triggering exocytosis. 5. The rate of exocytosis triggered via depolarization or intracellular Ca2+ release was much faster than that triggered via uniform elevation of [Ca2+]i (Ca2+ dialysis or flash photolysis of caged Ca2+). 6. The above findings suggest that both intracellular Ca2+ release and voltage-gated extracellular Ca2+ entry generate a spatial Ca2+ gradient, such that the local [Ca2+] near the exocytic sites was approximately 3-fold higher than the mean cytosolic [Ca2+]. However, neither cAMP nor the spatial Ca2+ gradient generated during depolarization could account for the high efficacy of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in stimulating adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion from corticotrophs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".