MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170992799 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1990.693607

Use Of Transputers In A 3-d Positron Emission Tomograph

2005· article· en· W2170992799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransputerComputer scienceScalabilityParallel processingComputationSpeedupHistogramTask (project management)Iterative reconstructionParallel computingImage processingComputer visionData acquisitionArtificial intelligenceComputational scienceImage (mathematics)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of a VME-based transputer network as a parallel processing engine for positron volume imaging is dis- cussed. We find that the speedups of parallel networks depend on two major factors: the ratio of computation to communica- tion for a task, and the size of the task, and we give a simple model to explore the limits to speedups. Through actual imple- mentation we show that real-time PVI data acquisition can be achieved with about 20 transputer nodes, and we estimate that 3-D image reconstruction can be achieved within 10 min using 200 nodes. Larger images and a larger number of histograms can readily be accommodated using the same parallel algo- rithms as our model places no limits to the size of the images. The versatility and scalability of transputers makes them very suitable for use in PVI tomographs in that the same transputers can be used for speeding up data acquisition, image reconstruc- tion, and display.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it