MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171423886 · doi:10.1109/twc.2006.1638671

Opportunistic power scheduling for dynamic multi-server wireless systems

2006· article· en· W2171423886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)WirelessSubgradient methodTelecommunications linkMathematical optimizationStochastic optimizationComputer networkStochastic processDistributed computingTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an opportunistic power scheduling scheme, i.e., a joint time-slot and power allocation scheme for downlink communication in wireless systems. Unlike past works, we allow multiple transmissions in a time-slot that could potentially interfere with each other. These multiple transmissions are allowed to achieve high system efficiency. Hence, it is important to not only select the mobiles to be scheduled in a time-slot, but also to allocate an appropriate transmission power level to these scheduled mobiles. We model the time-varying wireless channel as a stochastic process and formulate a stochastic optimization problem that attempts to maximize the expected total system utility with general constraints on performance or fairness. The power scheduling algorithm is obtained by using stochastic duality and implemented via stochastic subgradient techniques

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it