MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171632067 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.912325

Overloaded Array Processing Using Genetic Algorithms With Soft-Biased Initialization

2008· article· en· W2171632067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationNarrowbandAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceSpatial correlationGenetic algorithmConvergence (economics)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of genetic algorithm (GA) techniques to the problem of overloaded arrays, in which the number of transmitted narrowband signals is greater than the number of receiver array elements, is explored. A new receiver algorithm is presented, which achieves nearly optimal performance but requires significantly less complexity than the maximum-likelihood joint detection (MLJD) receiver. It uses GA techniques with soft-biased initialization, which is efficiently generated using spatial filtering, providing dramatic convergence improvements compared with other initialization schemes. Simulations using both idealized channel models and measured channel responses are used to investigate the impact of spatial correlation and imperfect channel state information (CSI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it