MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171820417 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2000.855849

Robust and efficient skeletal graphs

2002· article· en· W2171820417 on OpenAlexaff
Pavel Dimitrov, Charles Phillips, Kaleem Siddiqi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVoronoi diagramComputationTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmHeuristicSubpixel renderingTheoretical computer scienceMedial axisMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometryPixel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has recently been significant interest in using representations based on abstractions of Bhum's skeleton into a graph, for qualitative shape matching. The application of these techniques to large databases of shapes hinges on the availability of numerical algorithms for computing the medial axis. Unfortunately this computation can be extremely subtle. Approaches based on Voronoi techniques preserve topology but heuristic pruning measures are introduced to remove unwanted edges. Methods based on Euclidean distance functions can localize skeletal points accurately, but often at the cost of altering the object's topology. In this paper we introduce a new algorithm for computing subpixel skeletons which is robust and accurate, has low computational complexity and preserves topology. The key idea is to measure the net outward flux of a vector field per unit area, and to detect locations where a conservation of energy principle is violated. This is done in conjunction with a thinning process applied in a rectangular lattice. We illustrate the approach with several examples of skeletal graphs for biological and man-made silhouettes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207