MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171913316 · doi:10.1109/iros.2009.5354019

Planning collision-free and occlusion-free paths for industrial manipulators with eye-to-hand configuration

2009· article· en· W2171913316 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Léonard, Elizabeth A. Croft, James J. Little

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Task (project management)CollisionMotion planningQuadtreeRobotProbabilistic logicObject (grammar)Motion (physics)PixelEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a motion planning algorithm for industrial manipulators with the simultaneous constraints of avoiding collisions and avoiding the occlusion of specified pixellated regions of an eye-to-hand camera. The system uses a probabilistic roadmap to satisfy the constraints imposed by the command interface of typical industrial manipulators and uses dynamic collision checking to ensure collision-free motion. In the context of a task monitored by a camera, we enhance a probabilistic roadmap with a dynamic occlusion checking algorithm that is able to determine which pixels of the camera are occluded by the robot during each motion segment. The occlusion algorithm is formulated as collision algorithm where the field of view of the camera is represented as a quadtree of frustums. The proposed algorithm is demonstrated in industrial bin picking simulations where the gripper must not occlude the targeted object throughout the task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207