MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171921904 · doi:10.1080/10304312.2013.824859

Young body on the beach

2013· article· en· W2171921904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContinuum · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmortalityMetaphorAdorationRomanceSign (mathematics)Object (grammar)DramaArtAestheticsHistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cinema, the beach often becomes something beyond the kind of luscious but perfunctory site suggested in classical painting and in the complexities of eighteenth-century therapeutic discourse. It is a setting for notable drama, emphatic, romantic or apotheotic. Screened beach scenes go beyond nature by showing the sands as a heightener of dramatic effect. The beach often sets the display of a particular body, powerful and young but also, like the sand, part of the cycle of history. The young body on the beach is the object of distanct adoration in Death in Venice (1971), a metaphor for commercialization in Jaws (1975), a sign of the immortality of romance in Pauline à la plage (1983), and an outgrowth of ego confronting its reality in The Beach (2000).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it