MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174016580

Estimation and Selection in Regression Clustering

2011· article· en· W2174016580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisMathematicsCorrelation clusteringCURE data clustering algorithmRegression analysisRegressionSingle-linkage clusteringClustering high-dimensional dataData miningStatisticsArtificial intelligenceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regression clustering is an important model-based clustering tool having applications in a variety of disciplines. It discovers and reconstructs the hidden structure for a data set which is a random sample from a population comprising a fixed, but unknown, number of sub-populations, each of which is characterized by a class-specific regression hyperplane. An essential objective, as well as a preliminary step, in most clustering techniques including regression clustering, is to determine the underlying number of clusters in the data. In this paper, we briefly review regression clustering methods and discuss how to determine the underlying number of clusters by using model selection techniques, in particular, the information-based technique. A computing algorithm is developed for estimating the number of clusters and other parameters in regression clustering. Simulation studies are also provided to show the performance of the algorithm. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 62H30, 68T10, 91C20

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it