MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174018749 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2007.4436508

Polarization studies of CdZnTe detectors using synchrotron x-ray radiation

2007· article· en· W2174018749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsRedlen Technologies (Canada)
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCollimated lightSynchrotron radiationPolarization (electrochemistry)PhysicsOpticsDetectorSynchrotronElectronX-ray detectorRadiationParticle detectorOptoelectronicsNuclear physicsLaserChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High densities of impurities and defects lead to severe charge-carrier trapping that can be major issues in assuring the high performance of CZT detectors. For some medical- imaging applications, the typical X-ray flux can be very high. Under such high irradiation conditions, the trapped charge builds up inside the detector affecting its stability. This phenomenon generally is termed the polarization effect. We conducted detailed studies on polarization in CZT crystals employing a highly collimated synchrotron X-ray radiation source available at Brookhaven's National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS). We were able to induce polarization effects by irradiating specific areas within the detector. These measurements allowed us to make, for the first time, a quantitative comparison between areas where polarization is induced, and the electron- and hole-collection X-ray maps obtained at low flux, where no polarization is induced. We discuss the results of these polarization studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it