MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175735171 · doi:10.1515/htmp.2000.19.2.91

Microstructure of Directionally Solidified Ti-52Al-2W-0.5Si Intermetallic

2000· article· en· W2175735171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Temperature Materials and Processes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPratt and Whitney Canada
KeywordsIntermetallicMaterials scienceMicrostructureDirectional solidificationAlloyLamellar structureBrittlenessTungstenMetallurgyPhase (matter)Morphology (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phase transformations controlling the microstructural evolution during directional solidification (DS) using the Bridgeman process and subsequent cooling are described for a Ti-52Al-2W-0.5Si intermetallic. The DS structure consists mainly of columnar dendrites with various shapes. α-Ti with a dendritic morphology is the primary solidified phase, followed by an incomplete peritectic reaction liquid (L)+α → γ-TiAl. The remaining liquid solidified as y and silicides. During cooling after solidification a dendrites transform into ordered α 2 and y with various morphologies, including near fully lamellar, script α 2 in a y matrix and blocky α 2 in a y matrix. Very fine tungsten-rich precipitates are also observed. The DS alloy is quite brittle. The microstructural evolution and the reason leading to the brittleness of the alloy are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it