Device performance simulations of multilayer black phosphorus tunneling transistors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a theoretical investigation of ballistic transport in multilayer black phosphorus (BP) tunneling transistors (TFETs) with HfO2 as the gate oxide. First-principles calculations show that monolayer BP can be preserved well on HfO2 (111) surface. For a better device performance, the optimum layer and transport direction at different channel lengths are investigated. It is shown that BP TFETs have larger drain current in the armchair direction (AD) than in the zigzag direction, and the current difference can be several orders of magnitude. On-state current can be enhanced in the BP TFETs using thicker BP film, while the minimal leakage current is increased at the same time. To reduce the leakage current and subthreshold swing in the multilayer BP TFETs, lower source/drain doping concentration and smaller drain voltage should be applied. Compared to monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and MoTe2 TFETs monolayer BP TFETs in AD can reach larger on-state current at the same Ion/Ioff ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".