MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177859726 · doi:10.1300/j059v13n01_06

Devoting Ourselves, Devouring Each Other

2002· article· en· W2177859726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Progressive Human Services · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPublic relationsCommunity organizationWork (physics)AngerSociologyService (business)Political scienceHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)CriminologySocial psychologyPsychologyLawMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Community-based AIDS organizations are now key components in the response to the HIV epidemic in North America. They provide vital AIDS prevention and education and support services to those directly affected by HIV, as well as playing an important advocacy and political role. Despite their many successes, these organizations, like other community organizations, have often been characterized by considerable internal conflict and dispute. This paper draws primarily on interview data from a study of the evolution of 12 AIDS service organizations in Canada. It describes and analyzes some of the tensions and conflicts common in these organizations. The paper ends with a discussion of how to understand this conflicted history, and on the place of anger in community work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it