MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178566049 · doi:10.1139/t2012-083

Field study of wrinkles in a geomembrane at a composite liner test site

2012· article· en· W2178566049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWrinkleGeomembraneNoonMaterials scienceHigh-density polyethyleneComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringPolyethyleneGeologyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variation in length of the longest hydraulic features (connected wrinkles) formed in an exposed black high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liner observed at different times of the day and in different seasons over multiple years is presented for both a 3% base slope and 3H:1V side slope at the Queen’s University Experimental Liner Test Site (latitude of 44°34′N and longitude 76°39′W). The longest wrinkle observed on the 0.15 ha base was about 1500 m. The longest wrinkle observed on the 0.17 ha slope was about 2000 m. The length of connected wrinkles is shown to be primarily related to solar radiation, although the soil and ambient temperature played a role in maintaining wrinkles in the afternoon as solar radiation decreased. Wrinkles of less than 20 m connected length were observed for geomembrane surface temperatures of less than 30 °C and solar radiation of less than 600 W/m 2 . Wrinkles exceeding 500 m in connected length were observed for geomembrane temperatures between about 30 and 62 °C and solar radiation between 600 and 1100 W/m 2 . The vast majority (about 85%) of wrinkle heights were between 0.04 and 0.08 m with the average wrinkle height being 0.06 m and a maximum wrinkle height of about 0.18 m. The manually measured wrinkle widths around noon (when there was the greatest number of wrinkles) ranged between about 0.20 and 0.43 m, but most of the wrinkles were between 0.23 and 0.36 m with a mean of 0.29 m (standard deviation 0.05 m). The data from this study suggest that a reasonable estimate of mean wrinkle width would be about 0.2 to 0.3 m. The size of the area constraining the geomembrane is shown to affect the connected wrinkle length. Calculations of leakage for the wrinkle lengths and widths observed are reported to be consistent with what has been reported for landfills in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it