MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179510054 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2004.1462719

Time discrimination techniques using artificial neural networks for positron emission tomography

2005· article· en· W2179510054 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Daniel Leroux, D. Rouleau, C. Pépin, J.-B. Michaud, J. Cadorette, Réjean Fontaine, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorPreamplifierField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceNoise (video)Electronic engineeringScintillatorSIGNAL (programming language)Avalanche photodiodeComputer hardwarePhysicsArtificial intelligenceCMOSOpticsAmplifierEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relevant information in positron emission tomography (PET) is currently being obtained mostly by analog signal processing methods. New digital PET scanner architectures are now becoming available, which offer greater flexibility and easier reconfiguration capability as compared to previous PET designs. Moreover, new strategies can be devised to extract more information with better accuracy from the digitized detector signals. Trained artificial neural networks (ANN) have been investigated to improve coincidence timing resolution with different types of APD-based detectors. The signal at the output of a charge sensitive preamplifier was digitized with an off-the-shelf, free-running 100-MHz, 8-bit ADC and time discrimination was performed with ANNs implemented in field programmable gate arrays (FPGA). Results show that ANNs can be particularly efficient with slow and low light output scintillators like BGO (/spl tau/=300 ns), but less so with faster luminous crystals such as LSO (/spl tau/=40 ns). In reference to a fast PMT-plastic detector, a time resolution of 6.5 ns was achieved with a BGO-APD detector, as compare to 12.7 ns with conventional analog methods using a constant fraction discriminator. With LSO, the ANN was found to be competitive with other digital techniques developed in previous works. In conclusion, ANNs implemented in FPGAs provide a fast and flexible circuit that can be easily reconfigured to accommodate various detectors under different signal/noise conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004.Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207