MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180291405 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2012.2224674

Simulation of Transformer Hotspot Heating due to Geomagnetically Induced Currents

2012· article· en· W2180291405 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)
FundersCentre for Energy Advancement through Technological InnovationElectric Power Research Institute
KeywordsGeomagnetically induced currentHotspot (geology)TransformerThermalDistribution transformerEarth's magnetic fieldMechanicsGeomagnetic stormGeologyPhysicsGeophysicsVoltageEngineeringMagnetic fieldMeteorologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method to estimate transformer hotspot heating due to half-cycle saturation caused by geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). The method is based on fitting a closed-form analytical function to the calculated or measured thermal response of a particular transformer design, typically provided by the manufacturer, at its hotspot locations to a step dc current excitation. This fitted function can then be used to simulate the hotspot temperature profile for transformers of that particular design when subjected to GIC having an arbitrary profile over time. Using this approach, examples are presented of the winding and metallic hotspot thermal responses of the two transformers to recorded GIC time sequences, to illustrate how hotspots may be impacted on during a geomagnetic disturbance event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it