MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Influence of Biological Soil Crusts on Soil Characteristics along a High Arctic Glacier Foreland, Nunavut, Canada

2008· article· en· W2180482924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Antarctic and Alpine Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
FundersNetworks of Centres of Excellence of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEdaphicGeologySoil carbonChronosequenceSoil waterWater contentDeglaciationForeland basinTundraSoil sciencePrimary successionPedogenesisGlacierSoil organic matterTotal organic carbonEnvironmental scienceArcticGeomorphologyEcological successionGlacial periodEnvironmental chemistryEcologyChemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the physical, chemical and microclimatological properties of soils along a High Arctic glacier foreland and adjacent moraine in relation to the development of biological soil crusts. We examine various edaphic properties: soil temperature, volumetric water content, organic carbon content, and texture in surface samples (∼1 cm) with and without a cover of biological soil crust as well as changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, organic carbon, pH, volumetric water content, bulk density, and texture in crusted surfaces (<1 cm) and soil cores (5 cm) along a chronosequence following deglaciation. Soil crusts developed within four years of deglaciation and subsequent peaks in crust cover and thickness coincided with an accumulation of nitrogen and organic carbon in the crust. Crusted surfaces had significantly higher volumetric water content, organic carbon, a greater silt and clay fraction, and lower temperature compared to uncrusted soils. A steady supply of water from glacier melt promoted rapid development of biological soil crusts, creating an edaphic environment with enhanced moisture and nutrient properties which contributed to the high rate of vascular plant succession previously observed on this foreland. Results presented in this study are compared with edaphic conditions at other circumpolar sites and glacier forelands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it