Response of Wintering Steller’s Eiders to Herring Spawn
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributional and dietary responses of wintering Steller’s Eiders (Polysticta stelleri) to spring spawning of Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus) were studied along the Lithuanian coast of the Baltic Sea. Herring spawn is patchy, but is abundant and energy-rich when present. The objective of this study was to determine whether Steller’s Eiders modified their foraging sites and food habits to take advantage of spawn, or whether they were inflexible foragers as suggested by earlier studies. Steller’s Eiders altered their habitat use during herring spawn, moving to habitats where fish spawning occurred. Also, diet analysis demonstrated that herring eggs became an important food when available. Although the importance of herring spawn for Steller’s Eiders remains speculative, this study indicates that spawning sites could be important as a source of nutrients and energy for subsequent migration or reproduction, and should receive conservation consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it