Toward Computer-Based Support of Meta-Cognitive Skills: a Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
this paper, we describe how these solutions have been implemented in a computer tutor that coaches self-explanation within Andes, a tutoring system for Newtonian physics. We also present the results of a formal study to evaluate the usability and effectiveness of the system. Finally, we discuss some hypotheses to explain the obtained results, based on the analysis of the data collected during the study. INTRODUCTION Research on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) has been increasingly affecting education. While for many years ITS remained confined to research labs, today they have started moving into the classroom, showing their effectiveness for learning and influencing the structure of traditional curricula (Koedinger, Anderson, H., & Mark, 1995). However, existing ITS still target only a limited part of the learning process. They generally focus on teaching problem solving and domain specific cognitive skills. The long-term goal of our research is to explore innovat
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it