MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182787860

Phase transitions for the distance of random walks with applications to genome rearrangements

2006· other· en· W2182787860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenome Rearrangement Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom walkCoalescence (physics)SketchVisitor patternCombinatoricsMathematicsConjecturePhase transitionGenealogyArt historyDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceArtHistoryQuantum mechanicsStatisticsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study phase transition phenomena for the distance of random walks on graphs. In particular, we show how this question relates to the theory of random graphs and to stochastic processes of coalescence and fragmentation. This question is also intimately connected to some problems in genome rearrangement. Biographical sketch Nathanael Berestycki was born in Paris on December 6, 1980. He studied mathematics successively at Lycee Henri IV, Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan, and Universite Paris VI, before he moved to Cornell University first as a visitor and then as a full-time Ph.D. student. His thesis was cosupervised by Rick Durrett in Cornell and Jean-Francois Le Gall in E.N.S. Now aged 24, his first position will be at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, as a postdoctoral fellow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it