MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2182961570 · doi:10.6339/jds.2004.02(1).142

A Two-Stage Bayesian Model for Predicting Winners in Major League Baseball

2021· article· en· W2182961570 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Data Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSports Analytics and Performance
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKorea Science and Engineering Foundation
KeywordsLeagueMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityBayesian inferenceComputer scienceEconometricsField (mathematics)Markov chainInferenceArtificial intelligenceOperations researchMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The probability of winning a game in major league baseball depends on various factors relating to team strength including the past per formance of the two teams, the batting ability of the two teams and the starting pitchers. These three factors change over time. We combine these factors by adopting contribution parameters, and include a home field ad vantage variable in forming a two-stage Bayesian model. A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is used to carry out Bayesian inference and to sim ulate outcomes of future games. We apply the approach to data obtained from the 2001 regular season in major league baseball.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it