MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183213763 · doi:10.2118/175000-ms

East Vacuum Grayburg San Andres Unit, 30 Years of CO2 Flooding: Accomplishments, Challenges and Opportunities

2015· article· en· W2183213763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil in placeResidual oilFlooding (psychology)WorkoverEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recoveryDrillingNatural gasFossil fuelGeologyPetroleumMaterials scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The East Vacuum Grayburg San Andres Unit (EVGSAU) began CO2 injection in 1985 which is still continuing today. Performance of CO2 injection has been very favorable in the main pay zone with oil recoveries exceeding 45 percent overall in the unit. Technical challenges remain in maintaining and increasing oil recovery but future opportunities also exist such as CO2 flooding the transition/residual oil zone and improving overall volumetric sweep efficiency. Waterflooding in EVGSAU began in 1980 to pressure up the reservoir in preparation for CO2 flooding. CO2 injection began in 1985 with a 2:1 water: alternating gas (WAG) ratio to help provide conformance control. Overall oil recovery from the main portion of the reservoir in the CO2 flooding area alone is above 55 % OOIP. Approximately 12.5 % OOIP recovery has been due to CO2 flooding. This paper will detail some of the challenges experienced during CO2 flooding which include maintaining reservoir pressure above minimum miscibility pressure, maintaining high injection rates in WAG injection wells, and handling large volumes of produced gas. During the early 2000's, 19 laterals were drilled out of existing vertical wells which assisted the unit in increasing oil production rates and reducing gas coning. Future opportunities include expansion of the current gas plant to handle the increasing gas-oil ratio of produced oil as the CO2 flood continues to mature, CO2 flooding the transition/residual oil zone, infill drilling in the main pay zone to increase areal sweep efficiency and polymer gel treatments to address poor vertical conformance. A foam treatment is also being planned for EVGSAU. CO2 flooding in the EVGSAU has been impacted during its history by changing oil and CO2 prices and many technical challenges. Despite these challenges, oil recovery by CO2 flooding has been favorable and further steps are being taken to increase long-term oil recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it