MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183245968

The dental health status of dialysis patients.

2002· article· en· W2183245968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisPeritoneal dialysisHemodialysisDiabetes mellitusKidney diseaseIntensive care medicineImmunosuppressionInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with kidney failure who require dialysis is growing by 10% to 15% annually, and the likelihood that dentists will treat such patients is also increasing. The dental care of patients undergoing dialysis can be complex, given the prevalence of comorbid conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, renal osteodystrophy and immunosuppression, the presence of nondental prosthetic devices, and the use of antihypertensives and anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. These patients appear to be predisposed to a variety of dental problems such as periodontal disease, narrowing of the pulp chamber, enamel abnormalities, premature tooth loss and xerostomia. Dental care, as well as primary preventive measures, seems to have been neglected in these patients. Therefore, a study of the dental health of dialysis patients was undertaken. METHOD: Completion of a questionnaire and a noninvasive oral examination was obtained from hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients registered in the dialysis program at St. Paul's Hospital in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, as of March 1, 1999. Information was also gathered from the medical chart. Medication history as well as history of diabetes, hypertension, and nondental prosthetic devices were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 226 dialysis patients in central and northern Saskatchewan, 147 were interviewed and examined. Of these, 94 (64%) were dentate, and the same number had been on dialysis for a mean of more than 2 years; about a third were diabetic, almost all were hypertensive and all had nondental prosthetic devices or arteriovenous fistulae, or both. Sixty (64%) of the dentate patients were candidates for kidney transplantation. Most of the dentate patients reported brushing once or more daily, but they flossed infrequently or never. Dental visits were infrequent, less than every 5 years in 59 (63%) of the dentate patients. Findings in the dentate group included increased tooth mobility, fractures, erosion, attrition, recession, gingivitis and a high plaque index. A patient's dentist was contacted if the patient had seen him or her since starting dialysis (31 of the 94 dentate patients). Most (81%) of the dentists were aware that they were treating a dialysis patient. Medication records were incomplete for 29% of the patients, and only 2 (6%) of the patients had received antibiotic prophylaxis despite the fact that all had prosthetic devices or arteriovenous fistulae. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that the dental health of dialysis patients is poor and requires greater attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it