MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183404142

Ethnic Favoritism in Primary Education in Kenya

2014· article· en· W2183404142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCulture, Economy, and Development Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupKenyaCabinet (room)PoliticsColonialismPolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)Educational attainmentEconomic growthSociologyLawGeographyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

African leaders are widely presumed to favor members of their own ethnic groups with patronage resources. We assess the empirical validity of this claim by studying ethnic favoritism in the education sector in Kenya. We use data on the educational attainment of more than fifty thousand Kenyans dating back to the colonial era, as well as information about the ethnic identities of Kenyan presidents, cabinet members, and high-level education bureaucrats since the 1960s. We find that having a coethnic as president during one’s primary school-age years is associated with about a one-quarter of a year increase in years of primary schooling and with substantial increases in the probability of attending and completing both primary and secondary school. Coethnics of the minister of education also acquire more schooling than children from other ethnic groups. In contrast to recent studies, multiparty political competition has no impact on the degree of ethnic favoritism by presidents and ministers of education. We find that these patterns stem from both targeting by elites and expectations of such targeting by parents who make decisions about investments in their children’s schooling. * The authors thank members of the Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE) and seminar participants at Dartmouth, Georgetown, MIT, NBER, Oxford, Penn, Princeton, Rochester, Stanford, Virginia, the World Bank, and the Juan March Institute for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. We also thank Antony Munene for his research assistance. Kramon acknowledges support by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under Award No. FA9550-09-1-0314. Posner thanks the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences for its support during the paper’s initial stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesFrench-language works237,207