MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186383633

AIRCRAFT PATH EXTRACTION FROM NOISY TARGET DATA

2008· article· en· W2186383633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeading (navigation)Computer scienceRadarNoise (video)Sensor fusionReal-time computingGround truthRadar trackerAir traffic controlPath (computing)Representation (politics)Remote sensingAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligenceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testing of air traffic control (ATC) and air traffic management (ATM) systems benefits from the availability of realistic scenario data based on live recorded traffic. The difficulty with such data sets is the dependency on local geography and adaptation of the site where the data was collected. Scenario data is typically used in an environment different than the original, potentially with new sensor types and configuration. An example is the evaluation of the accuracy of the tracking and conflict alert functions for future systems that plan to implement data fusion of radar and automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data using a scenario based on data where only radar surveillance is available today. This paper presents an algorithm to extract “ground truth” from live recorded data such that the noiseless aircraft paths are obtained with their relative separations preserved and in a representation decoupled from the sensor types and the geographic configuration specific to the originating site. Ground truth obtained from the path extraction (PE) algorithm can be used as input to target generation software configured for a specific sensor environment as required for the system under test. The PE algorithm is basically a maneuver detector that looks for changes above noise in heading, altitude, speed and vertical velocity. The algorithm relies on identifying those segments where the relevant kinematic data (heading, altitude, horizontal and vertical speed) could be considered constant and consistent with noise. Unlike a purely statistical change detector, which is more sensitive to the correct modeling of noise, the PE algorithm is more robust because the straightforward geometric approach that it uses looks at the overall effect of a maneuver rather than trying to detect the point where the maneuver takes place. For example, a small change in heading is difficult to detect when looking for the maneuver point, but the change it produces is easily recognized by examining the entire realized track. The horizontal component of the extracted aircraft paths are expressed in stereographic coordinates on a common surveillance system plane. It is shown that, together with aircraft altitude, this choice of coordinate system lends itself to relocate the traffic easily to any region on the ellipsoidal Earth. The PE algorithm provides segmented aircraft path data, which in addition to its use to generate reference scenarios for testing, can also be used to infer aircraft intent, to obtain scenario characterization metrics, and for detection of the phase of flight. Metrics to evaluate the performance of the PE algorithm are presented and results of an evaluation are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it