MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186549493 · doi:10.4231/d3h12v80t

Application of discrete element modeling for simulation of cyclic direct simple shear response of granular materials

2014· article· en· W2186549493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas Advanced Computing Center · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete element methodSimple (philosophy)Direct shear testShear (geology)Granular materialSimple shearBiological systemResponse analysisComputer scienceMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyStructural engineeringEngineeringMechanicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Discrete Element Method (DEM) has been increasingly used to simulate and study the fundamental behavior of granular materials. This is due to the ability of the method to model soils as a collection of particles, which is considered more realistic compared to assuming soils as a continuum. The recent advances in computational capabilities along with the development of efficient DEM algorisms has made it possible to simulate problems with reasonable number of particles, and to develop more realistic 3D models. For example, DEM has been successfully used to model soil response under boundary conditions similar to those used in soil laboratory testing particularly under triaxial and direct shear (i.e. shear box) monotonic loading conditions. So far, only limited DEM analysis has been performed to simulate soil response under cyclic loading conditions. With this background, and considering the known common use of the Direct Simple Shear (DSS) test in characterising soil behavior particularly under cyclic loading conditions, DEM simulations of the cyclic DSS test were performed using Particle Flow Code in Three Dimensions (PFC3D) Version 3.1. In this paper, the results of the DEM simulations are compared with data from counterpart laboratory element cyclic shear testing performed using the NGI-type DSS device at the University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada. The stress paths obtained from the results of simulated DSS constant volume (i.e. equivalent to undrained) tests indicated an overall reduction of vertical effective stress with the progression of cyclic loading. In the simulations conducted representing loose granular material, relatively smaller shear strains were noted during the first loading cycle; whereas, a transient vertical effective stress value close to zero was developed along with an abrupt increase in shear strain during the last loading cycle. These results are much in accord with those observed from experimental testing of loose sands. This noted agreement between the results of the physical and numerical models suggests the suitability of DEM for use in modeling the cyclic response of granular materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it