MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186577168 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.16427

Le catastrophisme écologique contre la démocratie

2015· article· fr· W2186577168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il s’agit dans cet article d’interroger le régime temporel spécifique associé au catastrophisme écologique, et en particulier dans sa variante climatique. Nous cherchons à montrer que les images du futur qui sont utilisées dans les discours catastrophistes, que nous décrivons et dont nous analysons les différentes formes, produisent des positions politiques antidémocratiques. Dès lors, nous plaidons pour leur remplacement par une autre conception du futur, de la temporalité, et du temps lui-même dont nous esquissons les contours sur un plan théorique. Il ne s’agit nullement pour nous de contester la profondeur des crises écologiques que le monde expérimente actuellement, mais au contraire, en les ramenant dans le présent d’une part, et en montrant leur multiplicité contradictoire d’autre part, d’en faire prendre la mesure réelle. C’est ainsi que la possibilité d’une politique démocratique des rapports socio-écologiques peut être comprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it