Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il s’agit dans cet article d’interroger le régime temporel spécifique associé au catastrophisme écologique, et en particulier dans sa variante climatique. Nous cherchons à montrer que les images du futur qui sont utilisées dans les discours catastrophistes, que nous décrivons et dont nous analysons les différentes formes, produisent des positions politiques antidémocratiques. Dès lors, nous plaidons pour leur remplacement par une autre conception du futur, de la temporalité, et du temps lui-même dont nous esquissons les contours sur un plan théorique. Il ne s’agit nullement pour nous de contester la profondeur des crises écologiques que le monde expérimente actuellement, mais au contraire, en les ramenant dans le présent d’une part, et en montrant leur multiplicité contradictoire d’autre part, d’en faire prendre la mesure réelle. C’est ainsi que la possibilité d’une politique démocratique des rapports socio-écologiques peut être comprise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".