Delay Asymmetry Correction Model for IEEE 1588 Synchronization Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis proposes a delay asymmetry correction (DAC) model to enhance the IEEE 1588 synchronization protocol.The purpose of this work is to mitigate the effects of unpredictable packet delay variations (PDV), which cause asymmetric link delays on timing packets, in order to improve the synchronization accuracy of the slave clock with respect to the master clock.This is done by computing the time difference between the master and the slave clock in the presence of traffic in a network.The NS-2 results indicate that the proposed solution improves the slave accuracy by measuring the correct offset value in a slave clock for asymmetric communication link delays.The solution results show that the slave clock is able to achieve high synchronization accuracy in the presence of various bi-directional traffic loads, network congestions, and temporary network outage.Furthermore, when there is a routing path change due to the failure in the network, the solution also improves the accuracy of the slave clock with respect to the master clock.However, the proposed solution does not perform well when it is incorporated with the AOCM model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".