MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187650160

Discussion of \The Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimator"

2011· article· en· W2187650160 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshua Bengio

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMNIST databaseBoltzmann machineLatent variableEstimatorRestricted Boltzmann machineGraphical modelComputer scienceInferenceBlock (permutation group theory)Gibbs samplingArtificial intelligenceAutoregressive modelAlgorithmMathematicsApplied mathematicsMachine learningArtificial neural networkStatisticsCombinatorics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Restricted Boltzmann Machine (Smolensky, 1986; Hinton et al., 2006) has inspired much research in recent years, in particular as a building block for deep architectures (see Bengio (2009) for a review). The Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) is an undirected graphical model with latent variables, exact inference, rather simple sampling procedures (block Gibbs), and several successful learning algorithms based on approximations of the log-likelihood gradient. However, when it comes to actually computing the distribution or density function, it is intractable, except when either the number of inputs or latent variables is very small (about 25 binary hidden units with current computers and about an hour of computing, on MNIST).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and StatisticsSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207