MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188469143 · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-229-7_7

Avian Community Responses to Tidal Restoration along the North Atlantic Coast of North America

2012· book-chapter· en· W2188469143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalt marshMarshGeographyCulvertWetlandDikeFisheryOceanographyHydrology (agriculture)ArchaeologyGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salt marshes in the New England and Atlantic Canada region are widely affected by humanmade structures such as dikes, tide gates, bridges, and culverts, and from other impacts like dredge-spoil fill and mosquito ditches (Hansen and Shriver 2006), all of which alter the volume, velocity, and spatial pattern of tidal flow. In response to concerns about the impact of such management, coastal managers are now actively engaged in salt marsh restoration practices focused on the return of natural hydrology to impacted marshes (Konisky et al. 2006). Federal, state, and provincial agencies have initiated more than a hundred salt marsh restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine region since 1990 (Cornelisen 1998), and these practices continue to be a major management emphasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it