MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189322089

A Novel Robotic Hand-SARAH For Operations on the International Space Station

2002· article· en· W2189322089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruno Rubinger, Mike Brousseau, John Lymer, Clément Gosselin, Thierry Laliberté

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderactuationMechanism (biology)RoboticsEngineeringRobotic handGRASPInternational Space StationArtificial intelligenceOrientation (vector space)Control engineeringClosing (real estate)SMT placement equipmentSpace (punctuation)SimulationRobotComputer scienceAeronautics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the performance capabilities and possible applications of a novel design of a robotic hand for space applications that is self-adaptive and reconfigurable. In particular the Self-Adapting Robotic Auxiliary Hand (SARAH) was developed as a potential tool for Special Purpose Dextrous Manipulator (SPDM) on the International Space Station to support increasingly complex dextrous robotic operations on the International Space Station (ISS). SARAH's simple actuation and ability to grasp a large range of geometrical shapes, makes it an ideal multi-purpose tool used for unstructured and unrehearsed ISS operations. SARAH is being developed as a collaborative effort between MD Robotics Limited and Laval University. It consists of three underactuated fingers mounted on a common structure. The fingers can envelop various shapes including cylindrical and spherical geometries. SARAH has 10 DOF and is actuated only by the two drive systems of the SPDM End Effector or the ORU Tool Change Out Mechanism (OTCM). The key novelty of SARAH's design is that it is a completely self-contained, passive mechanism requiring only the existing SPDM-OTCM drives mechanism to actuate its fingers. The opening/closing of the fingers and the finger orientation are performed by the OTCM-Torque Drive Mechanism, while the switching between the two modes of operations are done by the Advance Mechanism of the OTCM. A reduced size version of SARAH developed for CSA is actuated by only two motors. One of the motors provides the opening/closing of the fingers while the second one is used for the orientation of the fingers. The overall envelope of SARAH is similar to an astronaut glove. However, SARAH's force capabilities are twice as large as applied by an astronaut in any EVA activities. SARAH has three fingers and each of the fingers has three phalanges. The self-adaptability of the hand is obtained using underactuation within and among the fingers of the robotic hand. The underactuation between the phalanges of a finger is obtained by using linkages and springs while the underactuation among the fingers is implemented by a special one-input/three-output differential. This paper presents a number of operational applications of SARAH on ISS. Experimentation results will be presented to illustrate the various application of SARAH. Possible Extra Vehicular Robotics (EVR) operations for SARAH include: SPDM stabilization when operating on the end of the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) in an unplanned environment, thermal blanket manipulation, temporary ORU storage location, auxiliary ORU manipulation. Ideally, this tool would provide increased SPDM functionality for unplanned operations and emergency situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207