MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189359559

Negotiated Geographies of New Orleans’s Place d’Armes, 1789-1852

2011· article· en· W2189359559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca Sheehan

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical geography · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare (algebra)StatuePoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyArt historyArtHistoryLawArchaeologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, New Orleans’s Place d’Armes (now known as Jackson Square) is a tourist attraction, a must-see in the city’s French Quarter (Figure 1). The square and its surrounding structures look much as they did in 1852, when the debonair designs of Baroness Micaela Almonester de Pontalba, daughter of an influential New Orleans colonist, came to fruition. In the high season, hundreds to thousands o f tourists visit the celebrated plaza to not only have their picture taken in front of St. Louis Cathedral and the statue of General Andrew Jackson, but also to browse sidewalk artists’ works, for Tarot card or palm readings, to listen to street musicians, and to watch magic shows and mimes. These activities in the Jackson Square area have been highly contested for decades and seemingly undermine (to some) itstrue historical, renowned, and genteel status and image of New O rleans. Nevertheless, as I show in this article, such activities, people, and contestations may also be interpreted as a continuation of the square’s past. It is my hope that this historical analysis will serve to support more inclusive perspectives concerning what, and who, are “authentically” part of Jackson Square specifically and public spaces generally. In 1721, France officially platted New Orleans with Place d’Armes as the single and central public square (Figure 2). 1 France planned the colony to be a commercial endeavor in transporting goods to and from the North American continent and intended Place d’Armes to be its cultural, economic, political, religious, and social center. As New Orleans developed into a commercial hub, so too did the status of Place d’Armes. By 1734, the Catholic Church, police, governor, court, and military established buildings along the square. Thus early on, urban order and progress resided literally and symbolically in Place d’Armes, as the open expanse and the b uildings bordering it articulated the location of urbanity and authority in the colony. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, as administrative powers and ownership changed between nations (France, Spain, and the United States), Place d’Armes continued to serve as the functional and symbolic center of New Orleans. Even when, after the Louisiana Purchase, the economic core began shifting from the French Quarter to the American area uptown, Place d’Armes still remained the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical geographySame topicUrban Planning and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207