MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189359559

Negotiated Geographies of New Orleans’s Place d’Armes, 1789-1852

2011· article· en· W2189359559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical geography · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare (algebra)StatuePoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyArt historyArtHistoryLawArchaeologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, New Orleans’s Place d’Armes (now known as Jackson Square) is a tourist attraction, a must-see in the city’s French Quarter (Figure 1). The square and its surrounding structures look much as they did in 1852, when the debonair designs of Baroness Micaela Almonester de Pontalba, daughter of an influential New Orleans colonist, came to fruition. In the high season, hundreds to thousands o f tourists visit the celebrated plaza to not only have their picture taken in front of St. Louis Cathedral and the statue of General Andrew Jackson, but also to browse sidewalk artists’ works, for Tarot card or palm readings, to listen to street musicians, and to watch magic shows and mimes. These activities in the Jackson Square area have been highly contested for decades and seemingly undermine (to some) itstrue historical, renowned, and genteel status and image of New O rleans. Nevertheless, as I show in this article, such activities, people, and contestations may also be interpreted as a continuation of the square’s past. It is my hope that this historical analysis will serve to support more inclusive perspectives concerning what, and who, are “authentically” part of Jackson Square specifically and public spaces generally. In 1721, France officially platted New Orleans with Place d’Armes as the single and central public square (Figure 2). 1 France planned the colony to be a commercial endeavor in transporting goods to and from the North American continent and intended Place d’Armes to be its cultural, economic, political, religious, and social center. As New Orleans developed into a commercial hub, so too did the status of Place d’Armes. By 1734, the Catholic Church, police, governor, court, and military established buildings along the square. Thus early on, urban order and progress resided literally and symbolically in Place d’Armes, as the open expanse and the b uildings bordering it articulated the location of urbanity and authority in the colony. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, as administrative powers and ownership changed between nations (France, Spain, and the United States), Place d’Armes continued to serve as the functional and symbolic center of New Orleans. Even when, after the Louisiana Purchase, the economic core began shifting from the French Quarter to the American area uptown, Place d’Armes still remained the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it