MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189502100

On the Powerful and Squarefree Parts of an Integer

2014· article· en· W2189502100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJ. Integer Seq. · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare-free integerCombinatoricsMathematicsInteger (computer science)Product (mathematics)Prime factorPrime (order theory)Geometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Any integer n ≥ 2 can be written in a unique way as the product of its powerful part and its squarefree part, that is, as n = mr where m is a powerful number and r a squarefree number, with gcd(m,r) = 1. We denote these two parts of an integer n by pow(n) and sq(n) respectively, setting for convenience pow(1) = sq(1) = 1. We first examine the behavior of the counting functions P n≤x,sq(n)≤y 1 and P n≤x,pow(n)≤y 1. Letting P(n) stand for the largest prime factor of n, we then provide asymptotic values of Ay(x) := P n≤x,P(n)≤y pow(n) and By(x) := P n≤x,P(n)≤y sq(n) when y = x 1/u with u ≥ 1 fixed. We also examine the size of Ay(x) and By(x) when y = (logx) η for some � > 1. Finally, we prove that Ay(x) will coincide with By(x) in the sense that log(Ay(x)/x) = (1 + o(1))log(By(x)/x) as x → ∞ if we choose y = 2logx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it