MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189502100

On the Powerful and Squarefree Parts of an Integer

2014· article· en· W2189502100 on OpenAlexaff
Etienne Cloutier, Jean–Marie De Koninck, Nicolas Doyon

Bibliographic record

VenueJ. Integer Seq. · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare-free integerCombinatoricsMathematicsInteger (computer science)Product (mathematics)Prime factorPrime (order theory)Geometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Any integer n ≥ 2 can be written in a unique way as the product of its powerful part and its squarefree part, that is, as n = mr where m is a powerful number and r a squarefree number, with gcd(m,r) = 1. We denote these two parts of an integer n by pow(n) and sq(n) respectively, setting for convenience pow(1) = sq(1) = 1. We first examine the behavior of the counting functions P n≤x,sq(n)≤y 1 and P n≤x,pow(n)≤y 1. Letting P(n) stand for the largest prime factor of n, we then provide asymptotic values of Ay(x) := P n≤x,P(n)≤y pow(n) and By(x) := P n≤x,P(n)≤y sq(n) when y = x 1/u with u ≥ 1 fixed. We also examine the size of Ay(x) and By(x) when y = (logx) η for some � > 1. Finally, we prove that Ay(x) will coincide with By(x) in the sense that log(Ay(x)/x) = (1 + o(1))log(By(x)/x) as x → ∞ if we choose y = 2logx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJ. Integer Seq.Same topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207