MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Britain, the British Landed Class, and Argentine Landowners

2005· article· en· W2190617619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roy Hora

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArgentine historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)AppealOrder (exchange)HistoryPhenomenonEconomic historyPeriod (music)EconomyGenealogyPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes the economic and cultural relationship between the British landowning class and the Argentine estancieros (large property owners) in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and explores some explanations for the influence of the former over the latter. It argues that for much of the nineteenth century, the example of the British rural order largely failed to appeal to the estancieros, and that it was only during the last quarter of the century that Argentine landowners became increasingly attracted to British farm technology and to the lifestyle of their British counterparts. Finally, it analyzes the reasons why the British example became increasingly irrelevant in twentieth-century Argentina. This article shows that the changing influence of the British landed order over the pampean estancieros is a phenomenon that merits historical exploration, for it reveals broad social transformations that have taken place in Great Britain as well as in Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbesSame topicArgentine historical studiesFrench-language works237,207