MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Substrate conditions, root and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of landforms rehabilitated after coal mining, sub-tropical Queensland

2011· article· en· W2196111152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMine closure · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsHudbay Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonisationSoil waterSporePerennial plantAgronomyHerbaceous plantBiologyEcosystemEnvironmental scienceBotanyColonizationEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The abilities of roots and their mycorrhizal symbionts to colonise often unfavourable materials are critical to successful ecosystem development after mining, both for long-term sustainability and for more immediate erosion control. In this study we examined the capacities of grass roots and their mycorrhizas to colonise successfully a range of soils and post-mining wastes following rehabilitation of landforms constructed after coal mining. Mean soil pH was slightly acidic and within the normal range for soils (pH(H2O) range ca 5–8) while the wastes were predominantly alkaline and more widely variable (pH(H2O) range ca 4–10). Soils were non-saline or slightly saline while most wastes were saline or highly saline. Both soils and waste materials were variably sodic. The depth distributions of fine roots and incidences of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonisation were assessed in the dominant perennial grasses and herbaceous plants in sites rehabilitated for periods ranging from ca 0.3 to 9.4 years. The concentrations of spores of AM fungi in the post mining materials were also assessed. No major barriers to root penetration were apparent in any of the minesoils examined and roots had colonised a range of materials, including some substrates putatively hostile to plant growth. Furthermore, significant mycorrhizal activity was measured in all landforms assessed, despite their lack of inoculation with AM fungi. Arbuscular mycorrhizal spore concentrations were unusually high in some surface soils but declined markedly with depth in the profile. Both AM spores and root colonisation regularly occurred to depths of 1.0 m or more but the highest concentrations occurred at less than 0.40 m. The consistent colonisation by roots and mycorrhizas of an eclectic range of post-mining soils and wastes demonstrated the innate capacity of (at least) the gross components of the plant-soil system to develop rapidly and extensively in favourable and unfavourable post-mining substrates. Of particular interest was the comprehensive and relatively-rapid natural colonisation by AM fungi of the biologically sterile, and sometimes chemically-hostile mine wastes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it