Synchronous yoga and meditation over distance using video chat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Community and social relationships are an important part of yoga and meditation despite the fact that they are commonly perceived as solitary activities. Family members and loved ones often share activities and experiences over video chat technology to sustain their relationships across distance, and we wondered if similar technology could allow for yoga and meditation partners to share their practice remotely. In our study, sixteen participants completed yoga and meditation sessions over distance and participated in semi-structured interviews about their experience. Our results show that video chat can support synchronous yoga and meditation over distance through seeing and hearing one's remote partner. Both video and audio play an important role in creating a sense of remote presence. Yet there are space issues, camera challenges, and issues with a lack of touch for instructional purposes. Future video chat systems for synchronous yoga should consider ways to improve these issues while balancing the need to keep technology in the background.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it