MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197320340 · doi:10.18843/rwjasc/v6i4/08

School Based Management at Matauli 1 State Senior High School Pandan

2015· article· en· W2197320340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & Commerce · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyPsychological interventionChinaQuality managementEducational leadershipQuality (philosophy)Medical educationPolitical sciencePsychologyPedagogySociologyManagement systemEngineeringOperations managementMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION:School-Based Management (SBM) System has been implemented in many countries, such as England, Australia, America, Canada, New Zealand, Hong Kong - China, and Indonesia; as published in the UNESCO report by Ibtisam Abu-Duhou (1999) and reported in a study entitled Examination of School-Based Management in Indonesia by Rita Karam (2007). This system aims at creating a climate of quality education by granting greater autonomy to the schools, so principals can be more flexible in decision making to introduce the program and the implementation of innovative educational practices in schools and increase the participation of teachers, staff, and stakeholders to school's success. However, the actual results of research on the impact of SBM on the quality of education is highly variable. There is research that concludes SBM application have a negative impact, some have concluded the implementation of SBM does not have a significant impact, although in concluding the implementation of SBM positive impact on the quality of education.Moussa P. Blimpo (2011: 18-20), from SIEPR Stanford University conducted a research entitled School-Based Management and Educational Outcomes: Lessons from a Randomized Field Experiment. This Research present the impact of the intervention on student learning outcome, teaching practices at the school level, and the school management two years into the interventions in all three groups. The estimates of the intent -to-treat average treatment effect indicate that a comprehensive school -based management and capacity building program called Whole School Development (WSD) have had no impact on students learning outcomes two years after their implementation. Students performance in the control group remains relatively poor and comparable to the baseline levels for all groups. This excludes the possibility that the control group may have equally improved over the two years due to other reasons.Meanwhile, the results of research at 28 elementary schools by Adam E. Nir from the School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, entitled The Impact of School-Based Management On School Health indicate no significant changes when comparing the integrated index for school health between the three years. However, significant differences appear when the various subsets of school health are compared. The results indicate that teachers put more emphasis on children's outcomes. Yet, at the same time, teachers report having a lower morale and increased bureaucratic load in comparison to the circumstances that existed in their school prior to the introduction of SBM. It is suggested that a school with school-based management is not only a place to foster student growth but also to foster the development of teachers. Therefore, emphasis should be placed equally on all the components of school health if SBM is to increase the professional autonomy of educators along with the effectiveness of the school.Then, Hess (1999: 494-517) suggests that after initial SBM program, student achievement increased in Chicago public schools. Such as Borman and others (2003: 125-230) in their meta-analysis of 29 SBM programs in the United States of America, conclude that schools that implemented the models for 5 years showed strong effects on achievement.School-Based Management, as a complex system which include comprehensive measures did not make it easy to apply. The effectiveness and efficiency of SBM implementation to achieve improved quality of education in schools requiring all educational elements in it to participate actively. While in Indonesia, the issue of the uneven quality of education in schools in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, it is so vast in terms of social, cultural, economic, and different geographical background which remain as the fact and phenomena that become problems that are not easy to overcome until today.However, the successful implementation of SBM in schools in Indonesia, basically closely related to the school's ability to realize the level of trust in the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 Year 2005 on National Education Standards (outlined in the regulations of the Minister of National Education in 2006 and 2007 on 8 Education Standards) which include Educator Standards, Standard Content, Competency Standards Graduates, Standard Process, Infrastructure Standards, Standards Management, Financing Standards and Assessment Standards. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it