MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208505135

Observations of HF signals propagated over high latitude paths

2002· article· en· W2208505135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAntennas and Propagation, 1993., Eighth International Conference on · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrough (economics)LatitudeTransmitterEveningGeodesyMeteorologyGeologyMiddle latitudesTelecommunicationsGeographyPhysicsEngineeringAstronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A frequency agile transmitter has been installed within the polar cap at Clyde River, NWT, Canada (70 degrees N, 69 degrees W). Five receiving and data logging systems have been deployed to provide four transauroral paths and one path contained entirely within the polar cap region. Results from two receiving sites at Leicester, UK, and Boston, USA, during a one-month experimental campaign undertaken from 16 January to 10 February 1989, are used to illustrate some of the influences of the auroral oval and mid-latitude trough on HF propagation. The trough controls the time at which signals with frequencies between 18 and 23 MHz are lost in the evening. The auroral oval can give rise to night-time propagation of signals on frequencies much higher than the usual night-time MUF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it