MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2212325937 · doi:10.1159/000402132

Dopamine-Sodium Relationship: Is Dopamine a Part of the Endogenous Natriuretic System?1

2015· article· en· W2212325937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to nephrology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de MontréalHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineNatriuresisExcretionUrinary systemSalineEndogenyEdemaHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A possible role of DA as an endogenous natriuretic hormone was reviewed under three aspects: (1) its excretion in response to saline vs. albumin-induced volume expansion, (2) the origin of urinary free DA and (3) urinary free DA excretion in an unexplained salt-retaining condition, idiopathic edema. We have shown (1) that the urinary free DA excretion increase in response to saline is specifically related to salt and does not occur when the same degree of volume expansion is induced by albumin, (2) that this increase in free DA originates in the kidney and (3) that idiopathic edema patients excrete less free DA than control subjects. It is proposed that free DA originating in the kidney is a rather sal than volume-dependent endogenous natriuretic factor. Its deficiency may contribute to excessive sodium retention in idiopathic edema. However, DA is probably not the single natriuretic hormone but a part of a natriuretic system, components of which are other renal vasodilating and natriuretic substances such as prostaglandins and kallikrein-bradykinin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it