MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2212325937 · doi:10.1159/000402132

Dopamine-Sodium Relationship: Is Dopamine a Part of the Endogenous Natriuretic System?1

2015· article· en· W2212325937 on OpenAlexaff
Otto Kuchel, Nguyen T. Buu, Thomas Unger

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to nephrology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de MontréalHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineNatriuresisExcretionUrinary systemSalineEndogenyEdemaHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A possible role of DA as an endogenous natriuretic hormone was reviewed under three aspects: (1) its excretion in response to saline vs. albumin-induced volume expansion, (2) the origin of urinary free DA and (3) urinary free DA excretion in an unexplained salt-retaining condition, idiopathic edema. We have shown (1) that the urinary free DA excretion increase in response to saline is specifically related to salt and does not occur when the same degree of volume expansion is induced by albumin, (2) that this increase in free DA originates in the kidney and (3) that idiopathic edema patients excrete less free DA than control subjects. It is proposed that free DA originating in the kidney is a rather sal than volume-dependent endogenous natriuretic factor. Its deficiency may contribute to excessive sodium retention in idiopathic edema. However, DA is probably not the single natriuretic hormone but a part of a natriuretic system, components of which are other renal vasodilating and natriuretic substances such as prostaglandins and kallikrein-bradykinin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to nephrologySame topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207