Incorporation of steroidal biomarkers into petroleum model compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of fully‐substituted 5,6‐benzoquinolines covalently fused to the chlolestane framework has been synthesized to serve as model compounds for the poorly characterized components found in the heaviest fractions of petroleum, namely the asphaltenes. Acid‐catalyzed cyclocondensation of an aromatic imine with 5‐α‐cholestan‐3‐one gives 5,6‐benzoquinoline cycloadducts incorporating the steroidal biomarker fused to the benzoquinoline system at the 3,4‐positions, with various pendent substituents in the 2‐position. X‐ray crystallography of three such derivatives shows that the solid‐state geometries of these molecules are quite similar, and packing in the solid state appears to be dominated to a great extent by the nature of the pendent substituent. X‐ray crystallography and solution phase circular dichroism spectroscopy together suggest that the conjugated benzoquinoline moiety adopts a helical conformation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".