Evangelicals, Social Media, and the Use of Interactive Platforms to Foster a Non-Interactive Community
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evangelical online churches, which harness public preaching to spread the word of the Christian gospel, have quickly adapted to online social media as their most effective form of mass communication. Bringing in members from around the world together in a single democratic space on the web, either on a Facebook page or a chatroom forum, these churches seemingly promote free interaction between their members in an effort to cultivate the community that is fundamental to all church groups. However, the authority of these churches, their large sizes, and the problematic user interfaces of the social media platforms that they use encourage non-interactive communities, rather than interactive ones. Through a content analysis of the Facebook and Twitter pages utilized by Evangelical online churches and by drawing on case studies previously conducted by scholars examining religious online communities, this essay will look at social media and its role in discouraging interaction between members in favour of interaction only with the church itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it