Accuracy Analysis and Evaluation of Angle Measurement System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter discusses the sources of errors in angle measurements and how their influence can be minimized or eliminated. It describes survey instruments and measurements for the effects of systematic errors. Typical systematic errors that can only be removed by adjusting the instrument or by mathematically correcting the angle measurements are due to the following error sources: plummet error, standing axis error, plate bubble error, atmospheric refraction, and deflection of the vertical. Direction measurements by double-centering procedure must always be obeyed in order to eliminate systematic errors caused by mechanical misalignment of the theodolite's axial system. Sources of random errors are pointing, reading, leveling, and centering of measuring instrument as well as centering of the target and the effects of residual atmospheric refraction. Finally, the chapter deals with testing procedure for precision theodolites as measurement system for angles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it