MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W222028279

Good Ozone, Bad Ozone

2013· article· en· W222028279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Beckrich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science Teacher · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolOzone layerTropospheric ozoneOzoneOzone depletionAtmosphere (unit)Atmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceStratosphereMeteorologyChemistryGeographyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One Free-Response Question (FRQ) on the Advanced Placement (AP) Environmental Science exam this spring addressed ozone (see On the web). Those knowledgeable about atmospheric chemistry might ask: or tropospheric? Well, the FRQ asked about both! Why is that tough? Most high school students, even those in advanced science classes, struggle to correctly distinguish between stratospheric ozone and tropospheric ozone. So, let's review. Strat ospheric ozone (aka good ozone) Part of our atmosphere's stratospheric layer contains a naturally high concentration of ozone ([O.sub.3]) molecules. These molecules are in a dynamic equilibrium with oxygen ([O.sub.2]) molecules--constantly decomposing and forming upon exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. molecules absorb some UV radiation, reducing our exposure at the Earth's surface, where it can cause sunburns, skin cancer, and cataracts. Stratospheric ozone also mitigates UV radiation's inhibition of photosynthesis and plant growth (see On the web). The depletion of this good ozone layer by emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), such as chlorofluorocarbons, is of global concern. In 1987, the Montreal Protocol was passed to reduce ozone depletion. According to the 2010 assessment of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the protocol successfully controlled the global production and consumption of ODSs over the last two decades. Nevertheless, ozone depletion will continue for many more decades because several key ODSs last a long time in the atmosphere after emissions end (see On the web). Tropospheric ozone (aka bad ozone) In the troposphere--the lowest part of Earth's atmosphere--ozone forms as a secondary air pollutant. Fossil fuel combustion, among other activities, leads to ozone formation through a complex series of photochemical reactions. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides extensive information on ground-level ozone (see On the web). Bad tropospheric ozone causes throat irritation and worsens respiratory problems in humans and leaf damage and reduced growth in plants. Urban areas experience this ozone as a major component of photochemical smog. Classroom activitiies To further understand stratospheric ozone, send your students on the Ozone Hole Tour created by the Centre for Atmospheric Science at Cambridge University (see On the web). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science TeacherSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207