MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220349219 · doi:10.1115/1.4031497

Application of Model Predictive Control to Control Transient Behavior in Stochastic Manufacturing System Models

2015· article· en· W2220349219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Markov chainModel predictive controlComputer scienceControl (management)Optimal controlProduction (economics)Production controlStochastic controlControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsEconomicsMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing complexity in manufacturing strategies and swift changes in market and consumer requirements have driven recent studies of manufacturing systems, with transient behavior being identified as a key research area. Till date, satisfying consumer demand has focused on steady-state planning of production, mostly using stochastic or deterministic optimal control methods. Due to the difficulty of obtaining optimal control for many practical situations, as well as in evaluating performance under optimal control, these studies have not been conducive to the analysis or control of transient behavior. This paper bridges this gap by applying model predictive control to a manufacturing system modeled as a discrete-time Markov chain. By modifying the initiation of production as probabilities within the Markov chain, a method is proposed to directly control the system to specific expected performance levels and improve its stochastic transient behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it