MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221372013 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2015.2501398

Flow-Based Management For Energy Efficient Campus Networks

2015· article· en· W2221372013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionDistributed computingComputer networkQuality of serviceRouting (electronic design automation)Control reconfigurationEfficient energy useGreedy algorithmStatic routingHeuristicSoftware-defined networkingRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have shown that the energy consumption of wireless access networks is a threat to the sustainability of mobile cloud services. Consequently, energy efficient solutions are becoming crucial for both local and wireless access networks. In this paper, we propose a flow-based management framework to achieve energy efficiency in campus networks. We address the problem from the dynamic perspective, where users come and leave the system in an unpredictable way. Specifically, we propose an online flow-based routing approach that allows dynamic reconfiguration of existing flows as well as dynamic link rate adaptation, while taking into account users' demands and mobility. Our approach is compliant with the emerging software defined networking (SDN) paradigm since it can be integrated as an application on top of an SDN controller. To achieve this, we first formulate the flow-based routing problem as an integer linear program (ILP). As this problem is known to be NP-hard, we then propose a simple yet efficient ant colony-based approach to solve the formulated ILP. Through extensive simulations, we show that our proposed approach is able to achieve significant gains in terms of energy consumption, compared to heuristic solutions and conventional routing solutions such as the shortest path (SP) routing, the minimum link residual capacity routing metric (MRC), and the load balancing (LB) scheme. In particular, we show that the energy consumption can be reduced by up to 7%, 35%, 44%, and 49% compared to Greedy-OFER, MRC, SP, and LB, respectively, while ensuring the required quality of service (QoS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it