MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2222959877

Aboriginal History: A Reader

2015· article· en· W2222959877 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bruce Strang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHistorySettlement (finance)State (computer science)OrthodoxySociologyMedia studiesLiteratureArchaeologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kristin Burnett and Geoff Read eds., Aboriginal History: A Reader. Don Mills: Oxford University Press, 2012. 512 pages. ISBN, 978-0-19-5432350. $84.95 paperback.I remember taking Canadian History in Grade 8, far too many years ago. The course dealt with European exploration of Canada and the gradual settlement of the northern part of the continent by French and British settlers. The Aboriginal inhabitants of the land were important only insofar as they helped or hindered the triumphalist narrative of the development of what eventually became the modern Canadian state. I was too naive at the time to realize the important omissions of the class and its textbook - the almost total absence of the stories of the people who lived here pre-contact and who had to react to, first the trickle, then the mass influx of European and other settlers and the racialist attitudes and diseases that they carried with them.Fortunately, a wide variety of people have been working for decades to deconstruct this narrative, to tell the story more fully and accurately, and to challenge the conventional orthodoxy that largely ignores the contributions of Aboriginal peoples to Canadian history. The editors of this reader, Kristin Burnett and Geoff Read, laud Olive Patricia Dickason's 1992 work, Canada's First Nations: A History of Founding Peoples from Earliest Times, that sought to write the history from the perspective of the Aboriginal inhabitants of the geographic region that would become Canada. This narrative, in and of itself, challenged the trite, inaccurate, yet pervasive misperception that Canada was a country with little history; self-evidently, history in Canada did not begin with the arrival of White men. Burnett and Read seek to extend Dickason's challenge to mainstream interpretations of Canada's past by providing a suitable companion reader for early-year survey courses in Aboriginal History. Their approach provides an impressive collection of articles and primary documents to shine light on the challenges that Canada's Aboriginal people have faced and struggled to overcome as a result of European, and then subsequent Canadian colonialism.The editors have organized the reader effectively. They provide an extensive introduction; it capably lays out the book's structure, describing and linking the fifteen chapters. The chapters cover a striking array of subjects: Aboriginal worldviews, early contact, population demographics, war, the fur trade, the Metis and issues of identity, Federal policy, the Indian Act, residential schools, region and culture, the economy and Aboriginal labour, women, health and wellness, activism, and treaties and self-governance. Each chapter follows a common pattern. All (save the first) include two historical articles, plus additional photographic or textual primary material. Each chapter includes an introduction to set the context for the subsequent readings. The editors clearly lay out the objectives students should achieve through read- ing the chapter. The learning objectives transcend simple acquisition of knowledge, and focus instead on developing students' understanding of deeper issues and forming broader conceptual linkages. The scholarly articles reflect, naturally, a wide array of issues. They also represent a cross section of opinion. The reader includes work by senior professors and professors emeriti as well as junior academics and senior graduate students. Many of the contributors are Aboriginal, and roughly half of the contributions consists of new work specifically for this volume. The articles reflect diverse approaches to studying history. Each chapter concludes with questions for consideration that engage students across the spectrum of Bloom's taxonomy of learning, from recall of information to more substantive subjects that would make for excellent essay topics and compelling group discussions. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207