Improving the Efficiency of Sealing Parts for Hollow Body Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Nowadays, expanding sealing parts in automotive hollow body networks are widely used. These parts are usually made up from expanding foams or an assembly of expanding foams and solid materials. The use of these sealing parts has demonstrated an influence on the noise inside the car. These findings proved the necessity of designing sealing parts especially to reduce the propagation of sound through the frame cavities and hollow bodies. In this work, experimental investigations have been conducted to characterize the acoustic performances (absorption, transmission loss) of the individual materials constituting the parts and their assembly. Some design rules have been extracted to improve their efficiencies. Also, to better understand the acoustic behavior of the expanding foams, existing theoretical models for closed or open foams have been tested and compared to measurements. The comparisons showed the importance of accounting for the resonant and non-resonant surface absorption of these closed-cell foams. A simplified modeling of the expanding foam consisting of an elastic core surrounded by a resistive layer is proposed and compared to measurements.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it