MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227965426 · doi:10.1002/alr.21678

A novel treatment adjunct for aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease: the low‐salicylate diet: a multicenter randomized control crossover trial

2016· article· en· W2227965426 on OpenAlexaff
Doron D. Sommer, Brian Rotenberg, Leigh J. Sowerby, John M. Lee, Arif Janjua, Ian Witterick, Eric Monteiro, Michael K. Gupta, Michael Au, Smriti Nayan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern UniversityCambridge Memorial HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrossover studyAsthmaAspirinInternal medicineSinusitisRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalPerioperativeProspective cohort studyNasal polypsGastroenterologyAnesthesiaSurgeryPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a clinical triad consisting of aspirin/acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) sensitivity, bronchial asthma, and nasal polyposis. Although respiratory reactions following ingestion of ASA and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered a hallmark of the condition, respiratory inflammation persists despite patients' avoidance of NSAIDs. Treatment of this condition remains challenging and includes both medical and surgical options. METHODS: A prospective crossover single-blind multicenter study involving 4 tertiary rhinology care centers (n = 30) was conducted in which patients were randomized to start with either 6 weeks of a regular diet or 6 weeks of a low-salicylate diet and then crossed-over for a total study duration of 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks (at crossover) and 12 weeks using subjective measures (22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 [SNOT-22], Nasal Sinus Symptom Scale [NSSS], and 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ-7]) and objective outcome instruments (Perioperative Sinus Evaluation [POSE] and Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score [LKES]). RESULTS: Data was analyzed for 30 patients. Wilcoxon rank sum tests determined that patients had improvement in their median difference in scores, which were all statistically significant, when they followed the low-salicylate diet compared to their regular diet: SNOT-22: 15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10 to 23.25), p < 0.001; NSSS: 3 (95% CI, 1.75 to 4), p < 0.001; ACQ-7: 4.5 (95% CI, 1.5 to 8.5), p < 0.001; POSE 6 (95% CI, 2.5 to 10), p < 0.001; and LKES: 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5 to 4), p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The low-salicylate diet may offer a novel treatment adjunct to the current management of AERD. Clinically and statistically significant improvements on both subjective and objective outcome measures were noted for the upper and lower respiratory tracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Forum of Allergy & RhinologySame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207