MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2231493904 · doi:10.1113/ep085338

The influence of metabolic and circulatory heterogeneity on the expression of pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in humans

2015· article· en· W2231493904 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel A. Keir, Taylor C. Robertson, Alan P. Benson, Harry B. Rossiter, John M. Kowalchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyCirculatory systemKineticsCycle ergometerCardiologyMedicineHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? The finding that pulmonary oxygen uptake ( ) kinetics on transition to moderate exercise is invariant and exponential is consistent with a first‐order reaction controlling . However, slowed kinetics when initiating exercise from raised baseline intensities challenges this notion. What is the main finding and its importance? Here, we demonstrate how a first‐order system can respond with non‐first‐order response dynamics. Data suggest that progressive recruitment of muscle fibre populations having progressively lower mitochondrial density and slower microvascular blood flow kinetics can unify the seemingly contradictory evidence for the control of on transition to exercise. We examined the relationship amongst baseline work rate (WR), phase II pulmonary oxygen uptake ( ) time constant ( ) and functional gain during moderate‐intensity exercise. Transitions were initiated from a constant or variable baseline WR. A validated circulatory model was used to examine the role of heterogeneity in muscle metabolism ( ) and blood flow ( ) in determining kinetics. We hypothesized that andGPwould be invariant in the constant baseline condition but would increase linearly with increased baseline WR. Fourteen men completed three to five repetitions of ∆40 W step transitions initiated from 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W on a cycle ergometer. The ∆40 W step transitions from 60, 80, 100 and 120 W were preceded by 6 min of 20 W cycling, from which the progressive ΔWR transitions (constant baseline condition) were examined. The was measured breath by breath using mass spectrometry and a volume turbine. For a given ΔWR, both (22–35 s) andGP(8.7–10.5 ml min−1 W−1) increased (P < 0.05) linearly as a function of baseline WR (20–120 W). The was invariant (P < 0.05) in transitions initiated from 20 W, butGPincreased with ΔWR (P < 0.05). Modelling the summed influence of multiple muscle compartments revealed that could appear fast (24 s), and similar toin vivomeasurements (22 ± 6 s), despite being derived from values with a range of 15–40 s and with a range of 20–45 s, suggesting that within the moderate‐intensity domain phase II kinetics are slowed dependent on the pretransition WR and are strongly influenced by muscle metabolic and circulatory heterogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207